by chemelec » Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:48 pm
Pertyfly, I appreciate Your Post, However:
I was told I was going to be Ignored on this particular topic, So I'll just sit on the sidelines and laugh at these guys doing the same experiments over and over again.
Most are experiments I did many, many years ago, along with thousands of others.
No Problem, Not even upset as I have Many things on the go.
But when certain people don't listen or even try to understand, there is not much point in talking or to explain anything.
There is only one possibility that I have ever been able to think of that might produce actual Perpetual motion. Unfortunately one very necessary component for this device hasn't been invented yet. I also can't think of how to invent this piece, so I'm Waiting.
And Based on the Very Unscientific Approach of guys on this forum, I wouldn't bother suggesting it.
Just one final point:
It is Typically claimed here that OU is Not Perpetual Motion.
Perpetual Motion is basically a device that can run forever with an Increased output power.
(I'm not sure if this defination take into account certain parts actually wearing out. Example: Bearings)
From what I gather here: An "Example" of OU: Would be a Battery powered device that puts out More power than goes into it.
Well if you use a battery to start such a device, than capacitors to Maintain a Charge after disconnecting that battery and a generator to keep the caps charged while at the same time drawing off other power to do other work, THAT IS PERPETUAL MOTION.
Sorry, No More Comments here.
If you Email Me, the Word "ELECTRONIC"
MUST appear in the Subject Line.
My NEW Website is:
http://chemelec.com