Low energy Input, mass hydrogen output methods in use.

[Jebus]

Don't feel bad, there are a lot of people here who seem to make things much more difficult than they need to be. If you gain anything from the experience of this site, hopefully it will be a better ability to filter out all the crap from the good ideas.

[AlaskaStar]

Jebus,

You may have noted that I have NOT e-mailed you. I choose this because I choose to avoid sources of negativity. I try not to bash, I try to teach what I have learned, and I try to keep learning. there have been many times in my life when I have been wrong, and hadn't a clue until it was shown to me as such.

We may all be in the wrong frame of mind here dealing with hydrogen, but until we get shown otherwise, we may never know.

So in that, You can e-mail me if you wish, and I have the responsibility to respond appropriately, or ignore it. Responsibility is a combination of 2 words: Response and Ability. meaning the ABILITY TO RESPOND APPROPRIATELY TO A SITUATION.

Likewise, I have looked over someone else's project here, and I think It deserves a great amount of further research and credibility. he is aiming at less than 1 volt to produce a slurry of hydrogen bubbles in water. this is great. and this thread is now so incredibly long it isn't funny.

Thrival has some good notes in his project folder that, if combined with another's project mentioned here, that may yeild some good results. and while I am not into stomping on other's intellectual rights, there may be a possiblity for a co-existance of 2 separate peices of technology to work together to get the job done.

as for an excellent Mosfet Switching Regulator, I found a set of 9 units inside a NETFRAME 450 SERIES Server unit. these mosfet units take 300 volts input at 5 amps DC, and put out on the 12 volt ones: 12 volts 5 amps, and on the 5 volt ones: 5 volts 8 amps. they are unique in that they mirror a pulsewidth of input UP TO 300 VOLTS, and output a regulated voltage in an exacting mirror output of the input frequency. so basically there is 300 VOLTS DC input, and then on the other 2 leads on the same end of the unit, a frequency of low power is put in. the circuits regulate the power flow, and mirror the frequency generator inputs exactly. so bottom line: DC INPUT, WAVEFORM INPUT SEPARATE FROM DC POWER, and then DC OUPUT-REGULATED and MODULATED TO MATCH THE INPUT FREQUENCY.

I don't know the availability of old NETFRAME server units for scrap, as this was controlled with a 486 DX 100MHz processor, and not very fast. it had a quantity of sixteen, 10 gigabyte harddrives. all SCSI data leads.

so any use of a module of this type could be used in experiments here might yeild some interesting results.

AlaskaStar

[Jebus]

[AlaskaStar]

[AlaskaStar]

On the note of this thread being long, I was researching the surface tension of water. I have found that to break the surface tension, one can use SOAP. soap is a bi-polar substance, and allows the surface tension of water to be broken very easily. Glycerin is a by-product of Bio-Diesel. it is also a good ingredient to have in soap. so in a bi-polar subastance, one can certainly try it with an electrolyser, and if successful, could one possibly use a soap-water solution to help break up the gaseous resistive barrier that occurs on the plates with brute force electrolysers? If this does in fact work, then the booster efficiency may very well go up, and make it viable to use the power onboard the vehicle to run Hydrogen fuel.

I am preparing for Winter. The NOAA Predicts 11 feet of snow, and in the area I live in : "A multiple of extended periods of time with temperatures into the -60 to -70 degrees" I am far from ready this year. after I get prepped to deal with that much snow, and that much cold, I can more easily deal with the building experiments once more.

AlaskaStar

[MarkinAustralia]

Hi mate
I am going to phone today, Your still in bed asleep at the moment.
I thought of the soap trick a while back, and will try it. However I am wondering how many bubbles the soap itself will create?
11 ft of snow..I find that hard to comprhend.
I studied that file you sent me many times...will talk soon
Mark

[AlaskaStar]

11 feet is collectively over the winter. we used to get MUCH MORE than that, but recently we have been seeing more than a few serious weather changes. winters with NO SNOW, winters with little snow and mega cold, hurricane force winds like clockwork that never were before, stuff like this. believe me, global warming is real. the questions is: Is is induced by man, or is it a natural cycle? the Sahara Desert was once a florishing rain forest. it must get warm and moist for that to occur. when things cool down, they dry up.

AlaskaStar

[Steve555]

I have not read this hole thread but I thought this might be about a simalar method to Stan Meyer, the way that he uses electorlysis. I have looked at his diagrams and plans and it looks not to be so diffcult.

[Palic]

[MarkinAustralia]

[Mark Seymour]

[MarkinAustralia]

[Danberman]

[Highnick]

sounds a bit like there is a mystery that modern science cannot explain, a trivial pursuit of idealistic conditions, that we all know impossible. This revelation brought by alaska would ergo be a solution to the worlds greatest emission problems, ingenious it sounds, but overunity is quite impossible i must say.

[AlaskaStar]