Put 50 miles on it yesterday and it's running very good. Have not checked gas mileage yet.
More to come!!
Statistics: Posted by BroBob1 — Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:41 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
on second thought, with that vacumm leak there, you would be asking for a tuning nightmare. try draining some water out of the bubbler, or adding in an inlet on the top of the electrolyser. lemme draw that one up.....
Statistics: Posted by resident_genius — Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:04 pm
]]>
The only thing left is to try a "Y" fitting in the fuel line after the fuel pump
Statistics: Posted by BroBob1 — Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:19 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
in my opininon- stop doing the "top-off" method. i see this as an enourmous and i mean- ENOURMOUS variable.
purchase a small, graduated container and fill it with exactly a liter or whathaveyou- of gasoline. run this straight into the carb with petcock inbetween, hang it from your handlebars.
before shutting the engine down, turn off the petcock and disconnect the fuel hose, so all fuel is consumed and float bowls empty before continueing.
do your run(3x), calculate your fuel mileage this way.
THEN perform your HHO booster tests in this manner-
buy/build a PWM
three runs, 25% of possible output.
three runs, 50%....
three runs, 75%.....
three runs, 100%...
then report results.
i must emphasize patience and variables! the reason this is still in a shroud of uncertainty is because too many backyard ding-dongs are doing half-assed testing.
Statistics: Posted by resident_genius — Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:42 pm
]]>
So I decided to crank up the volume of HHO. Adding more NAOH and now producing 1 LPM @ 22 amps. I strapped on a fully charged car battery to the back seat of the bike and hooked it up directly to the Gen with a switch with no connection to the bike's electrical system for this test.
I now proceeded to do a 42 mile run after topping off the tank, that I have done several times before, averaging 50 MPH with 2-3 stops for traffic lights.
And the results are: NO GAIN??
Yes! I checked for leaks and all that, so after many different tests and configurations done on this bike, I removed the unit! I would like to have reported positive gains, but there are none! And there is no computer controlled fuel management system on this bike.
Statistics: Posted by BroBob1 — Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:16 pm
]]>
Few more questions for you.
1) Can I know how much amps your electrolyser consumed to generate 3LPM?
2) You mentioned 2 deep cycle batteries. Can I say, you are not pulling current from car alternator or car battery but instead using seperate sets of batteries to power your electrolyser?
3) Can I know exactly where you pump gas into? Vacuum manifold or air intake manifold (After air filter and before throttle body)?
4) I assume you haven't use EFIE to manipulate ECU for adding hydroxy.
As I explained to you before, I haven't fix EFIE to confirm the fuel economy for EFI cars. I have pulled wires yesterday to fix the EFIE but suddently my time occupied with some important matters. I may fix the unit today or tomorrow depands on car availability (father in laws car).
Wow, 5.4L engine? I'm using 2.0L engine car and feel the pinch of fuel price hike. How can you tolerate with 5.4L engine? Currently, all my test cars are below 2.0L so I don't really know much gas needed for bigger engine cars.
According to Bob Boyce, more than 2.0LPM of hydroxy gas, the spark timing got to be altered to close to TDC. If not counter productive and your car starts losing milleage.
Some of my friends who experimented hydroxy reported that for small carburetor car (660cc) able to double the mileage with inefficient electrolyser. The electrolyser he was using producing less than 500mL but able to double the mileage. Other friend who uses latest EFI car (1200cc) reported that by turning on and off electrolyser every 5 to 10 minutes, able to push the ECU into panic stage and double the mileage. Well, these are some reliable feedbacks I got from friends.
I have inject hydroxy into my small 100cc motorbike engine long ago and RPM was doubled/tripled at idling. This shows that hydroxy does work but other factors example sensors tries to counter the savings. I'll let you know the result after I fix EFIE into test car. Time...time...time... Why not 48 hours a day?
Statistics: Posted by kumaran — Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:58 am
]]>