The Buck circuit does indeed perform a transform; in fact it is often referred to as a DC Transformer. The sustained output current from the inductor is several times greater than the pulsed input current. T=L/R The input "charging" pulse sees a higher impedance than the inductor during discharge, therefore a brief charging pulse results in an extended discharge current pulse.
It is not intended for the inductor to reach magnetic saturation, nor is it ever desireable. Magnetic saturation of the inductor in the Buck circuit would result in heavy losses.
Temperature does indeed affect the conductivity of the electrolyte solution so therefore, a certain amount of coincidental heating is productive. However, once so much heat is produced that the electrolyzer becomes a "steaming behemoth" then the losses are very considerable.
You have posted some strong opinions which are, unfortunately, quite incorrect. The Non-Isolated Buck DC to DC converter circuit is well established as a highly efficient and very reliable means of "transforming" power that is very widely used in low voltage power distribution systems and all computers being produced today. It has, without any doubt, proven its utility.
The Buck circuit is not intended as an enhancement to the Meyer Non-Electrolysis Cell, but is rather intended to increase the efficiency of the simple automotive electrolyzer booster which relies upon conventional electrolysis.
Contrary to your expressed opinion, Meyer had numerous patents relating to a Non-Electrolysis Resonant Cell which utilized high voltage monopolar pulses feeding an LC Circuit coupled to the Non-Electrolysis Cell. In order to develop the high voltage needed across the cell electrodes it is absolutely necessary to insulate one or more of the electrodes with a high voltage dielectric. Only then will anyone attain the several KV needed, with a superimposed resonant waveform, which will account for the small "milliampere" reactive current "through" the cell.
I do concur with your belief that "Meyer was not your buddy." He was a very wily man who used deceptive language to obfuscate the simplicity of his cell and its attendant circuitry.
Regarding the Buck Converter and whether or not it will increase the efficiency of ordinary electrolysis in the series electrolyser operating at 14 Volts, comparisons must be made. I have done that and can vouch for the truth. I therefore invite any who may desire to put it to the test to do so. The results will be gratifying.Statistics: Posted by SeaMonkey — Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:18 am
]]>