http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 7125&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 6104&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 9365&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0221&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0288&hl=en
And BELIEVE ME, this is undeniable proof that if I can build a unit like this, ANY idiot can build one.
I've been reading the posts from Alaskastar and kudos to him for being so helpful and mysterious in his answers yet I think I've found something close to what he is describing which is a combination of a few designs I've seen on this site plus the main idea he's been trying to bang over our heads since his first posts. This is a picture of what I think Alaskastar is talking about.
http://picasaweb.google.com/savage1r/My ... 4321446850
And I believe Alaskastar is right, but I would explain his idea a different way. Consider for a second that you're using a simple rod electrode design. Surface area is the key. If you're using a rod you're simply using all the atoms on the outer surface of the iron rod, which is pretty limited. Imagine if you could use most of the atoms contained in that same rod. The way to increase the surface area of that rod is to break it down into as many pieces as possible (Alaskastar's analogy of tennis balls to bb's). So, say you grind that iron bar into dust and filings and fill the two tubes illustrated in the drawing with them. You'll have the maximum amount of iron exposed the the maximum amount of water+sodium carbonate. This SHOULD (and believe me, I could be really freaking wrong here), but SHOULD increase the amount of hydrogen and oxygen produced massively compared to the simple rod or the more complex plates design. We are maximizing surface area exposure and hopefully making the whole process more effecient. Let me know what you guys think, hopefully I'm not totally retarded, but I probably am
