]]>
My experience says that it can be inproved upon by adding coils in behind magnets 9 and 10. Influencing the face of a magnet with either attraction or repulsion will cause the same to ocure at the back of a magnet. This is almost never used. By adding a coil in behind the magnet extracts energy for free in pulsed attraction motors.
In the above case, as magnet 5 is compressed against magnet 9 in repulsion, the back of 9 will "ring" if given a path, and a coil to extract that energy. It will also increase the magnetism of magnet 5 and increase repulsion. If a cap is use to gather this energy with a diode block, and the coil is shorted out at max pressure, magnet field is released for another burst of energy.
I think I will try one of these in my spare time as it is simple and cheap to make.
By the looks of the patent, there is no imput energy, but uses the power of an unblanaced gravitasional force to create a vibration which is inhanced by the replusion of magnets out of phase with each other.
I have been working on some of his ideas and how to impliment them. One of them I have already sent to Ron Pugh who has a project he is working on. His video is featured on Veljko home page.
Ron is trying to marry this patent to the out put
I sugested something like this is more versitile and will extract more energy.
Just enough weight is use to reset the pull down by the pendulum. With a little added weight on the wheel to create a flywheel, different types of generators can be tested, the best being lowlenz , or of little back emf. I like reflected energy as in coil behind the magnet instead of in front. I like going against the grain and doing things backwards, as that way nature can work for you instead of against you.
Thomas
Statistics: Posted by Lightwave — Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:29 am
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>