]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
This should help resolve all confusion about this group now. Yes the moderators do indeed have access to forums that the general population does not. But you show me 1 board ...and I mean 1, that this is not the case. It has to be that way guys and you know it!
So to all who wish to continue this little conspiracy theory, I should have just removed ALL of your arguments. -Sorry!
I'm further distressed by the fact that no one commented on my "Little Red Hen" story??? I even gave a link to it
-You have to admit it was appropriate.-Bottom line, you want to be "important" here, you have to do a little work and volunteer to be a moderator.
Statistics: Posted by Chris — Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:27 pm
]]>
Hooking up Bob's cell requires a torrid transformer. Ok? Follow his instructions and you will have the best. Just do what he has shown and he said that we could contact him if we need more help.
Basically what happens durring anyones resonant reactions is that energy for the aether is acquired and this accounts for more out than put in. Without resonance series cells can produce a magnetic field strong enough to up efficiency or more out than put in on a lower level.
There are not many other people doing this stuff. I have looked hig and low. Most folks do not understand what I just wrote, how could they? Have of us have never heard of the unified fields theory.
Without a basic knowledge of chemistry, physics, science, whatever as a school boy this stuff will go right over your head.
This is the best place to share about H2O2.
Later days and better ways!!
Statistics: Posted by ElectroGasMan — Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:51 am
]]>
]]>
Now that I'm thinking more clearly I have something VERY VERY embarrassing to throw at all of you. This goes for EVERYONE who assumed there was something underhanded going on with level 2 access.
READ CAREFULLY: This is how you get into level 2 access...
http://oupower.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=203
That's it ...that was my criteria. Was it a secret group? Sort of. But could you get in... yes.
See when people think that there's some work involved you tend to weed out the crap pretty fast. So how many replies are in that thread??? 2? wow ...see a pattern here guys?
I had to ask the other mods on 2 occasions who they might consider to be a good moderator. I had to hunt for moderators because no one was volunteering. Mod = level 2
It's as simple as that.
The embarrassing part is that you all had the opportunity to join but no one cared to do so; yet now how many people are crying conspiracy? Look up the little children's story of "Little Red Hen" and see if it fits here guys.
http://www.bres.boothbay.k12.me.us/wq/n ... ed_hen.htm
Some apologies here would go a long way. -But hey I'm just the site admin, so it's probably not important.
Statistics: Posted by Chris — Sun Nov 12, 2006 7:50 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
please write to me as I do like communicating by emails. I do about 10 a day to various people who are working on hydroxy. Not everyone feels comfortable discussing things in open forums.
Chris
Chris...I didnt mean to upset you, as I said I have benefitted greatly from the information here and tried to contribute. I guess the point is the fact there was another level invite only . I had recieved emails from two other members who were aware of this and they felt it wasnt the right thing. Obviously I got my facts wrong about you setting up the new server as that seperate area has been there for some time. I appollogise for that
Hmm as far as miraculas discoveries...well I give you the status quo of where I stand on various devices.
1. Peter Lowrie
I helped sponnsor peter with some money and equipment for his latest test rig. Peter I feel over engineered it and has had a lot of trouble getting it going. he has put in a huge effort and continues to do so. If his theories hold true we will soon see. At this stage he is stripping some of the complications off and getting back to basics.
2. One project I am working on with someone in the states who is building the cells (prolifically) has in the course of there developments come across some unusual effects. These include (and i have yet to have it accurately tested) the power being put out greater than the power being put out why still producing hydrogen. This has occured for a combination of the following factors. Plate size, plate spacing,cell sepration and concentration of electrolyte. At this stage we havnt really got a clue but will be following up. The same design also when run not under vacuum has a tendency to run at high amps when first fired up the stabalisers at low amperage after a few minutes. A visable film is seen to build up on one of the plates and the gas output is not effected. tests of these cells running for +100 hours repeatably sees no change. the efficency is well bellow 1 litre per wh when this happens. if we reverse the polarity every few seconds the plate cleans up and the amperage increases but the gas production does not increase in proportion. Until we have a better understanding of this I am relucant to post any further information so as not to mislead anyone.
3. Terro's designs.
Excellent and simple to build but without resonance will never do better than Fradays. that is ok re boosters (some very happy Asian chaps been getting 50% fuel savings on them)
3. Frank Roberts.
Waste of space and nothing new.
4, Bob Boyce.
Bob certainly has designed the cell that many others have been building (including many people in Australia) I feel that rich (looking in) has with his dogy alternator alerted us to the fact that resonance is possible. Bobs own experiences confirms that, but many are having difficulty in the final wiring in to the cell od Bob's design. I know there is something unique in that. I believe Bob has got the goods....we perhaps are just missing the bits we need to complete it.
I also feel Waterbrad is making some interesting observations. What causes thes effects that can be debated but I for one like his approach.
5. Fred or Bluey appeared to have some great efficencies on a series cell. however when it was eclosed we realised the results wernt nearly as good as we thought.
I realise at this point I could go writing on for a few days...so most I have to say you already know.
I really cant see why you have reacted the way you did but I do think you should take into account how it makes others feel.
1. "The cat out of bag" I wont disclose but others as well as I have detected it.
2. The one lousy post was actually quite informative
3. Some of us can produce highly technical data that might have been usefull however many people have role. I am a generalist and a communicator. I am quite capable at anylysing data and I look at linking the many pieces from different sources to try and gain a greater understanding. I also direct people to where they might find more information in the area they are looking at. Some real gems appear here regularly.
4. Given there is "one lousy post" what is this other information?
My intent was to get a reaction and confirm that there was another level. You did that and my behaviour as you pointed out was childish. However children have a way of getting what they want.
You have every right to have private forums...I am on a few myself..but poeple know about them. I am on them and share information i lean from them with others (with the forums permission of course)
Given you are pissed of with me I understand you justification of banning me. I wouldnt mind staying but that is up to you. It is common in history to shoot the messanger.
I guess what got under my skin is the crieteria you used to select people. personally it didnt worry me if i was in or not ...but is did worry others who I consider great contributors, experimentors and were getting results
Perhaps my methods could be questioned but at least its all in the open and been delt with.
Kind regards
Mark
Statistics: Posted by MarkinAustralia — Sun Nov 12, 2006 6:12 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>