I just watched the series of Meyers videos from Colorado. His message, in part, seemed to be that this was something that could be built in a garage.
He talked about economics in relation to this being a very inexpensive process. Rather than ramble on frequencies, he emphasized the importance of reducing amps and increasing voltage to accomplish the opposite of electrolysis. He talked about using 304 stainless. He talked about increasing voltage from 12 to 20,000 volts.
I am sorry, then, to see people spending so much time, money, and effort going into other directions, while simultaniously attempting to replicate Meyers work.
An alternator can easily be modified to pulse current. An auto coil raises voltage from 12 to over 20,000 while restricting amps. 304 is also usually cheaper than 316. Certainly any system can be improved with refinements. So after one gets a basic system working, then they can make improvements, refining frequencies, better s.s.,etc.
From what I have seen of Bob Boyce's work, I think that he is using a combination of Meyers anti-electrolysis and electrolysis. Bob's big coils run a combination of constant current with pulsed appendages.
I just hooked up a big toroid to a WFC and was surprised to see how it restricted amps even on unpulsed dc. Yet output was comparable to previously using triple the amps, with strange bursts of increased production. Toroid is 5" across, cost about $15 from a surplus place.
BillStatistics: Posted by mrgalleria — Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:27 am
]]>