Spence
Statistics: Posted by spencyg — Mon May 21, 2007 10:02 pm
]]>
Thanks for your conscious reply, but the domain name www.xogen.com is for sale and those tired old videos with Stan Meyer are just that... No one, I mean No one has replicated those claims that Stan made. He him self didn't even allow any third party to examine his working device and claims.... That cell on the buggy didn't look anything like the one in his lab..
This was my favorite.... All we are missing is an extension cord....
http://youtube.com/watch?v=y__YCvFF8iM
As far as Stephen, - - is this where legit companies keep their promotional documents YouTube ? ? ? ? Wow a new world... I thought companies actually have web sites, addressed and phone numbers .... Maybe you can help us here since you seem to know that......
Looking forward to some facts from you in the future not unsubstantiated BS.
Statistics: Posted by H2-Paul — Mon May 21, 2007 8:50 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
Some observations I made.
1. The spark from an ignition coil will not jump across a gap underwater.
2. If the electrode touches the other side underwater, the coil will short out and either blow up the ignition module or the coil or both.
3. The spark ignition system is large Voltage, but low amperage.
After blowing up my ignition rig, I decided to try hooking up a 12v battery and sparking the electrodes underwater.
As long as the 2 electrodes were moving and the wire was not allowed to stick to the drum, there would be a blue spark and hydrogen bubbles were produced.
If the wire stuck to the electrode, it would quickly heat up and short out the battery.
In the patent diagrams there is a "large capacitor" missing. This supposedly goes between the ignition coils and the electrodes.
I believe the way to replicate this would be to run the device using a large 12v battery to produce the spark at the electrodes, but also with a pulsed high voltage spark from an ignition coil.
After blowing up my rig, I gave up on this project. It does have some merits, but all in all, I think it is ultimately doomed to fail due to the price of aluminium.
I also began to try and think up ways of modifying this to run on scrap aluminium, which would be great if it could be done. Open the lid and chuck in some scrap aluminium engine parts, top it up with water and shut the lid.
It could be done, but the energy required to run the system would be similar to what is required to run an arc welder... Big hint here. This device is basically an underwater welding rig.
Think about it....
Statistics: Posted by biggeorge — Sun May 20, 2007 6:15 pm
]]>
Spence
Statistics: Posted by spencyg — Sat May 19, 2007 6:27 pm
]]>
Pellets made out of aluminum and gallium can produce pure hydrogen when water is poured on them, offering a possible alternative to gasoline-powered engines, U.S. scientists say.
And the follow on comment from spencyg said:
You'll never see CNN doing a story on Stan Meyers, Bob Boyce, or any of the others who have made serious headway in the search for a truly useful energy source.
Well, the thought here is that Bob Boyce nor Steven Meyer have produced a system to power a car so there is no comparison or story to be published like the one from Honda and Bob insists that he is nor working on that as well as he stated in the previous and other posts....
Not even Steve Meyers brother can't get it together after 10+ years of additional research with that close connection.... And the interesting part is that listening to him speak on Blog Talk Radio he didn't even know that the Hindenburg Airship was filled with Hydrogen, he thought it was helium. - the host was probably embraced for him, makes you think....
Statistics: Posted by H2-Paul — Sat May 19, 2007 5:25 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Spence
Statistics: Posted by spencyg — Fri May 18, 2007 12:49 pm
]]>
]]>