]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Sorry for mistakenly put wrong figures for LPM. The rest of calculation are correct. I will display the corrected calculation again with other new info gather from you today.
Bob Boyce welding unit (During conditioning)
Plate size : 6" x 6"
Voltage : 142.5
Amps : 6.02
Gas output (LPM) : 6.7
Wh/L : 2.13
Efficiency : 110.20%
Power supply : Brute force
Bob Boyce welding unit (After conditioning)
Plate size : 6" x 6"
Voltage : 142.5
Amps : 6.02
Gas output (LPM) : 15
Wh/L : 0.95
Efficiency : 246.71%
Power supply : Brute force
Bob Boyce welding unit (With resonance drive)
Plate size : 6" x 6"
Voltage : 142.5
Amps : 2
Gas output (LPM) : 15
Wh/L : 0.32
Efficiency : 742.61%
Power supply : Resonance drive
Check out those figures. With just proper conditioning & brute force, the unit nearly 2.5 times Faradays efficiency. For plate size 6" x 6", the max amps can feed in will be 9A. The unit still running under max current yet performs better.
Resonance drive... Look at those figures. Bob says he can't really measure the gas output (too much), but with I just estimate around 15LPM and got above 7 times Faradays efficiency. I think the efficiency above 10 times Faraday is achiveable with resonance drive.
Statistics: Posted by kumaran — Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:16 pm
]]>
Bob
Statistics: Posted by Bob Boyce — Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:18 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
I'm waiting for Chris comment on this matter to clear our confusion. He never measure gas output from this unit. He mentioned that 4 wal-mart design got same amount of gas with his first 80 plate series cell. The gas output I took from 80 plate series cell and come up with the efficiency figure for his 4 wal-mart design. Comparing with my isolated cell data, Chris 4 wal-mart design might not be that efficient (1.625Wh/L).
Bob Boyce car hydrobooster
Plate size : 6" x 6"
No of plate : 8
Voltage : 13.8
Amps : 10
Gas output (LPM) : 1.5
Wh/L : 1.533333333
Efficiency : 153.37%
Supply type : Brute force
Bob Boyce welding unit
Plate size : 6" x 6"
Voltage : 142.5
Amps : 6.02
Gas output (LPM) : 1.5
Wh/L : 2.133955224
Efficiency : 110.20%
I have my own set of other peoples project data in excel file. Gather as much information as they post and immediately put into excel file to check thier cell efficiency. I look this in positive manner to check where I'm standing. Below, on or above par.
Statistics: Posted by kumaran — Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:06 am
]]>
build an efficient unit,,,,,when Chris has Made 1.625 Wh /L
with a very easy to build 5 cell unit.?
And then he went on to make another unit which probably
will cost up toward $600 in Material alone, and hundreds of hours
labour...???? Without some kind of Fancy electronic drive unit,
this Bigger unit wont get any where near 1.625 Wh /L.
I think there must be something wrong here.! " smiles "
Statistics: Posted by glenn_aircooled — Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:28 am
]]>
No of cells : 4
Plate size : 6" x 3"
No of plate per cell : 12
Voltage : 12.0
Amps : 15
Average voltage per cell : 3V
Gas output (LPM) : 1.85
Wh/L : 1.625
Efficiency : 144.71%
What makes this isolated cell more efficient compared to smaller version? Is it number of plates or size of plates used per cell ?
Confusion...
Statistics: Posted by kumaran — Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:52 am
]]>