]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
Check the following video link:
[url]http://www.icubenetwork.com/files/watercar/non-commercial/dave/videos/Wfcrep.WMV[/url]
Happy hunting guys.....Hope I Helped!!
Statistics: Posted by ravzz — Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:07 pm
]]>
The Circuit Design doesnot belong to Frank Roberts!!......on paragraph 3 of page 1 it says the system has been proven by Dave Lawton and is described in D14.pdf which was a replication of STANLEY MEYER'S Electrolyser, the proof that this circuit was tried by Dave Lawton and [u]if you could go to page 5 paragraph 4 the explanation given there is for TUBES(Stanley Meyer), six sets to be exact and not plates like the ones given in the circuit diagram!!!!!![/u]
Correct me if I am wrong!!
Statistics: Posted by ravzz — Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:41 am
]]>
]]>
I think Frank Robert runs his cell under vacum. From Patrick Kellys document, Patrick emphasize on using bubbler for protection purpose on original Roberts design.
The cell should be directly connected into air intake. The vacum (below atm) from air intake causes the cell produce more gas. I also read somewhere that by just using two electrodes cell which connected to air cond pump then to air intake gives more than 50% extra MPG. No safety bubbler in this design also.
How about amps draw & heat for cells running under vacum?
Statistics: Posted by kumaran — Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:17 am
]]>