by resident_genius » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:52 pm
sorry to triple post *cough* Chris where's that EDIT function! *cough*
but following my above statement, if you were to follow the path of 7 positive electrodes @ 13.8DCV, dividing an average cell flow of twenty-five overall ampheres, that'd be (25/7=3.57)Ampheres per cell, so thats very low amperage, and you've got a HHO generation to waste heat generation ratio of about 7:1(7 parts waste heat to 1 part HHO), if my math is correct. that puts effeciency in the 14% range. yikes. (above calculations done with 2.0DCV per cell being called the "perfect" voltage per cell) thats 345 total watts, with only 50 watts being put forth into HHO generation.
simply lowering the voltage would be a huge first step in making this cell more effecient..... @ 5VDC, 25 amps, thats 22% effecient... its a start.....
(above calculations done with 2.0DCV per cell being used as "perfect" voltage) this cell is a total of 125 watts, with 50 wats being used for HHO generation....
however lets look at effeciency of a true series cell +NNNNNN-, for example, a 13.8DCV system, seven cells, and for simplicity's sake, lets say no current leakage, and enough cell surface area for 0.25 amps per sq in..... (13.8\7=)1.97DCV per plate. running at 25 ampheres, thats near 95% of electricity being used to run the cell, again- 345 total watts, and about as much being used in actual HHO generation.
as far as making BF (brute force) 'lysers, using three plates(at a time) is the best way to do it. one middle positive and two outer negatives.
in all honesty, the best BF 'lyser is the one daisy chained to six others just like it, in series of course.