Aloha,
SORRY- just saw this topic.
I don't get online everyday, so I can miss some things. It's to bad so many repeat topics are constantly being started. It would help everyone if we got the habit of replying to existing topics, as there are enough to cover any situation.
I see no corrosion with Robic, I use 1/8 tea. per gallon with one coil, 1/2 tea. with two in series. Some of the pics are with Robic.
304 is fine, I honestly don't agree with all the particularities with s.s. Get what you can, at the best price. Mine is always free. I just got two commercial restaurant refers free, that we are cutting up.
No noticeable changes switching polarity.
Watch your timing. You likely do not have to change it at all, unless you are making lots of hydrogen.
With a 1.5 motor, two cells in series, 1/2 tea. lye, full vacuum into intake will give you 20% or more increase in economy, in my experience.
Bill
Some questions for mrgalleria...
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
by mrgalleria » Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:08 pm
-
mrgalleria - Regular Poster
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:52 am
- Location: Big Island, Hawaii
by mrgalleria » Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:28 pm
Aloha,
Sorry, I need to amend my former reply.
I am seeing a disturbing amount of metal erosion. For a temporary fix, alternating connections seems practical.
Does anyone know if lowering individual coil/plate voltage by stacking would help with this problem. Or is pulsed current the answer? What about using high voltage?
I have some stainless which is magnetically attractive, and some that is not, would using one or the other for positive help this corrosion problem?
Bill
Sorry, I need to amend my former reply.
I am seeing a disturbing amount of metal erosion. For a temporary fix, alternating connections seems practical.
Does anyone know if lowering individual coil/plate voltage by stacking would help with this problem. Or is pulsed current the answer? What about using high voltage?
I have some stainless which is magnetically attractive, and some that is not, would using one or the other for positive help this corrosion problem?
Bill
-
mrgalleria - Regular Poster
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:52 am
- Location: Big Island, Hawaii
by Looking In » Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:34 am
Rich (Looking In)
((((Is it really so difficult to tell a good action from a bad one? I think one usually knows right away or a moment afterward, in a flash of regret.)))) BOOM
((((Is it really so difficult to tell a good action from a bad one? I think one usually knows right away or a moment afterward, in a flash of regret.)))) BOOM
- Looking In
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:06 am
by fixaze » Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:02 am
The 304 I have is not magnetic. I'd say to use the non magnetic ss for the (-) plates?
http://www.jcwhitney.com/FLEXIBLE-EXHAU ... 10101.jcw/[/url]
I know this 304 exhaust tubing will last more or less indefinitely when used under a car in salty conditions.[/url]
http://www.jcwhitney.com/FLEXIBLE-EXHAU ... 10101.jcw/[/url]
I know this 304 exhaust tubing will last more or less indefinitely when used under a car in salty conditions.[/url]
I want better mpg....
-
fixaze - Regular Poster
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:00 pm
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Hydrogen Production via Electrolysis
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests