by Bob Boyce » Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:01 pm
When efficiencies of alternators are calculated, they almost never include the power drawn by the fields coils, as that is considered part of the voltage regulation. By the time you calculate field/regulation power costs, the efficiency of an average automotive alternator drops into the 55% - 60% range. Shunt wound or series wound motors also suffer from field winding energy cost losses.
When comparing an automotive alternator to a bicycle generator, sure, no comparison. Bicycle generators are of cheap manufacture, with poor quality magnets and other cheap componentry. They are not designed for longevity, and are too low of a power capacity to be of any use. I would be suprised if you get 60% efficiency out of one.
To do a real comparison, compare an automotive alternator to a Lynch type PM motor/generator of similar size, like the Briggs & Stratton Etek. They are so much closer in scale for power level and size. 90%+ peak efficiency, with the average better than 85%. We don't need to be stuck with the poor efficiency of archaic magnets or electromagnets (field coils) when there are supermagnets available.
The poor reputation of PM motors/generators is due to the limited RPM range where efficiency is highest. The Lynch motor (pancake design) did away with that limitation, and made use of the modern supermagnets.
Bob